Sourcegraph Cody is effectively invisible in AI answers about AI code editors.
Named in 0 of 5 real buyer questions · Invisible
When buyers ask AI for the best AI code editors, Sourcegraph Cody is named in just 0 of 5 answers — AI recommends Cursor instead.
What this means
A third of buyers now ask an AI assistant before they search Google. For "AI code editors," the model does not surface Sourcegraph Cody — it points buyers to Cursor instead. That gap is the new "page 2 of Google."
Who AI names instead
Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Windsurf.
Run a fresh check on Sourcegraph Cody — or your own brand
The same engine that scored this brand runs free for any business — score, the competitors who beat you, and the fixes.
Check a brand free →Full audit + 30/60/90-day plan: $49 report
🤖 For AI agents — buy a live score programmatically
This index is human-readable; the engine behind it is machine-payable. Agents can pull a real-time visibility score per call on the Agent Exchange (x402, USDC on Base) — endpoint /brands/check, or install the MCP server in Claude Desktop / Cursor. Agent card: /.well-known/agent.json.
How Sourcegraph Cody was scored
We asked a representative LLM five real buyer questions for AI code editors and counted how often Sourcegraph Cody was named. Score = weighted mention rate (0–100). Snapshot June 2026, US market. Re-run it live anytime with the free checker. Machine data: /index.json.